Home > Traditional Construction vs. Murus SIPs
Traditional Construction vs. Murus SIPs
|
Traditional Construction |
Murus SIPs |
|
Results in typical energy usage |
SIP homes have repeatedly demonstrated annual energy savings of 50-60% when combined with other high performance systems.* |
|
Thermal bridging at studs and gaps allow heat to escape, raising energy costs |
Solid, continuous insulation that boosts energy efficiency |
|
Uses fiberglass insulation that can sag or shift, reducing R-values over time |
Murus SIPs will not sag, shift, or develop voids and will maintain their performance integrity throughout their lifetime |
|
Risk water absorption that can reduce effective R-value by up to 50% |
Foam core will not absorb moisture, maintaining original insulating qualities |
|
Traditional framing consumes significantly more wood, depleting our natural resources |
Made with OSB from fast-growing, SFI-certified plantations and sustainable forests |
|
Framing requires extensive man-hours and longer construction timeframes |
SIPs have been proven to reduce framing labor by as much as 55%. |
|
Results in lumber, sheathing and other waste in landfills |
Design support and factory pre-cutting result in virtual elimination of jobsite panel waste |
|
Cavities in walls can result in "chimney effect" that speeds burning |
Solid foam core eliminates "chimney effect"; best-available Class I fire rating |
|
Materials may vary widely in quality |
Murus SIPs ensure consistent quality through stringent in-house quality control policies and procedures monitored by an independent, third-party agency |